I almost forgot to show off my new hairdo!
Here it is:
I prefer it slicked down. It’s nay bad as they say in bonny Islington.
Haven’t counted up all the money I’ve raised but I’ve got almost £300 in cash (including a £50 cheque from my managers manager)!! Thank you to everyone who donated, I’m almost gutted my hair looks quite nice. Imagine how much I could have raised if I’d done something really drastic
The Little Princess Trust will be sent a cheque tomorrow.
Also, I changed the layout of my blog. You don’t mind, do you?
Cx
Westminster Skeptics: Does Political Blogging Make a Difference?
Admittedly, I couldn’t pay attention to the whole talk at Westminster Skeptics as I was too busy flitting and flirting my way around the room as always, and ended up hanging out with a couple of mates making rude jokes and sniggering quietly at the back. One thing I will say was that the outcome of the debate was pretty much decided from the get-go. Does political blogging make a difference? Yes, or at least yes we bloggers would all like to think so.
Nick Cohen argued that blogging can not and will never replace classic journalism, and journalism demonstrably influences public opinion, before he stuck his two fingers up at the audience of bloggers and shouted “Ner ner ni ner NER!”*. On the question of blogging vs journalism, I’m not so sure. My blog is primarily for entertainment, I’m not using it to change the world, but there are many other blogs around who are dedicated to research or informed opinion (Jack Of Kent, NHS Blog Doctor, Ben’s Prison Blog, The Quackometer, Dr Petra) – these blogs are useful as well as entertaining and informative – perhaps they will change the world. My other gripe with this point is that it takes a binary approach to the subject. Why should blogging and journalism be at loggerheads? In my time, I’ve met plenty of journalists who also blog. Blogging seems like a great way to publish all the stuff your editor doesn’t want to go to print. Okay, it might not be seen by the same number of people, but it’s getting published, and hopefully read.
Likewise, many bloggers have crossed over into the mainstream media (I’m not abbreviating this to MSM, because in my neck of the woods it means something different). Martin Robbins of www.layscience.net frequently has articles published in The Guardian and the Times, just the other day he was in the Independent. Jack of Kent, David Colquhoun, Simon Perry, I could go on – they have all had their say in the printed press, be it local or national.
Sunny Hundal gave loads of examples of times when blogs have influenced mainstream journalism. Remember the “Muslim extremist” who claimed he was targeting prominent British Jews like Alan Sugar, Amy Winehouse and Jon Ronson? The likes of Richard Wilson (of Don’t Get Fooled Again fame, who was far too grown up to take part in our rude-joke-a-thon) regularly posts stuff uncovering some of the heinous acts of the rich and powerful. The 10:23 Campaign I was involved in started out as a bunch of Northern bloggers thinking “enough is enough” and putting together an international protest that was widely covered in the mainstream press. There was a photo of me in the Daily Mail and Sunday Telegraph next to Dave Gorman. My granddad was so proud!
I believe it was Robin Ince who said “The internet is not a library. It is an infinite public toilet attached to a library” – Bloggers, moderators, commenters and blog readers are democratic voters too. Many mainstream media outlets have a blog section these days, the printed press needs to move on or move out.
*That didn’t actually happen
[APPLAUSE]
I’m shaving my hair off for charity!
A few days ago, I decided that I’d very much like to shave my incredibly long hair off.

This is how it looks today...
Why the hell would I do such a thing?
- Whilst eating a big bowl of spaghetti a few days, my luscious locks got tangled up in the fork. This happens a lot.
- Pretty much every item I’ve ever knitted or crocheted has some extra keratin in it. In the past, I liked to think it made a fluffy hat that little bit more special. Now it’s just annoying.
- Sometimes I wake up choking, because I’m smothered in my own hair.
- It’s a bastard to hoover now that I have a carpeted floor in my bedroom.
- It takes about an hour to dry, using a hair dryer. And about 3 hours to dry without.
- I had short hair as a teenager and it looked pretty badass.
- There might be some control issues at play here after discovering that there are only a few areas in my life in which I have complete control. This is something my mum suggested to me.
- It means I can totally dress up as Halle Berry in Catwoman more often (mediocre film, great character/costume design – Sharon Stone looked great and you know it).
- I’ve had long hair for a couple of years now and felt like a change.
- I’m donating it to a really wonderful charity, The Little Princess Trust, who provide real hair wigs for children suffering hair loss as a result of cancer treatment.
Yes, I’m fully aware that points 1, 2, 3, and 9 could be solved by the clever application of hair gadgets. I own many hair things – pink things, glittery things, spiky things, stretchy things, sharp and dangerous things, all manner of contraptions to make my hair look different every day. Why bother putting stuff like that in your hair when you could just… you know… get rid of it instead?
This is the style I’m going for:

I chose this style mainly because it allows me to donate as much of my hair as possible to the Little Princess Trust, but also because it’s quite versatile. I had something similar when I was a bit younger, just not shaved, so I’m not too bothered about the aesthetics. I have a good shaped cranium!
The appointment with the hairdresser is all booked up for tomorrow (Saturday 6th Feb) at 1pm in Croydon. Providing I can teach my mum how to use my iPhone, we’ll put pictures up showing how I’m doing. Get ready to see a grown woman cry for a good cause!
If you’re able to, please sponsor me. All the proceeds go to this great charity and I’m really proud to be doing something for a good cause. So far I’ve raised about £130. If you’re coming to Westminster Skeptics in the Pub on Monday, I’ll be collecting more, so if anyone wants to donate, please let me know! I’ve also set up an events page, where you can donate directly to them. Please help! Your donations really do make a difference
Muchas gracias x x x
10:23 – Was it good for you too?

Photo courtesy of Kelly Haddow, photographer and mamajama extraordinaire.
A few months ago, I almost blew the entire covert operation we call 10:23. I wrote a blog post (now deleted, although I may re-post it for sentimental reasons) called “SUICIDE!” in which I called to arms my fellow skeptics to join me in a crusade against the often ridiculous claims of homeopathy. It got retweeted, people talked about it, prominent skeptics approached me in the pub to get involved. Little did I know that a group of bold, brave, and allegedly beautiful people had already been planning exactly the same thing for weeks – and I was on the verge of killing it completely!
Before I had the chance to destroy everything, their chief, Andy, got in touch with me to find out if I wanted to help with theirs. At first, I had no idea what skills I could offer. I’m just a normal person who occasionally tours the periphery of geekdom. My talents are audio-typing (70+ WPM I’ll have you know!), quoting Star Wars on Twitter and offending women with children (perhaps monitor your child’s online activities, rather than seeking to censor my free speech?) – I was stumped. Initially, they needed someone for London Skeptics in the Pub, and someone to help get in touch with all the Skeptic in the Pub groups in the UK. Easy. Most of them were on my Twitter feed, I just had to Google the rest and raise some hell. As it became clear that I had the ability, time, and passion to do more, my role became more involved.
Maybe, around this point, it would be good to make a couple of things clear:
- I am not, nor have I ever have been employed by any pharmaceutical or science based company. My CV consists of mainly office PA/secretarial work for law firms and more recently, a fine arts company; and voluntary events work (for London-based raves if you must know, I like to party). I once applied for a job at the Science Museum gift shop but I didn’t get it, probably because it was the summer and a lot of people wanted to work there. I’m a relatively normal person, ok? Really, I am.
- Nobody got paid any money at all for 10:23. The t-shirts were sold to cover our expenses, which included breakfast for my voluntary helpers (in the form of delicious cake and fruit!) and a round of drinks in the pub after the Trick or Treatment conference we attended. Every single person participating purchased their own bottle of pills, including Simon Singh, Evan Harris and Dave Gorman. If we were doing this for a profit, my helpers would have got lunch as well.
- The reason I did this out of love and not money was because I care about public health. I see no reason for a sane person to argue against evidence based healthcare. It has been posited that the 10:23 campaign is “attacking homeopathy”, to that I say why not? If it’s strong enough to withstand scrutiny as so many supporters of homeopathy claim, what’s your beef? The #ten23 column in my Tweetdeck contains a few studies showing homeopathy to be effective (mainly by @DrNancyMalik), and yet it only takes a very brief understanding of scientific papers (or a mate who knows how to read them) to see that every single one of these studies has either shown to have the slightest possible benefit, or none at all. If conventional medicine showed these same results, there would be hardly any conventional medicine.
Friday night, I couldn’t sleep. During the day, we were told (incorrectly) that we were not allowed to film in Conway Hall. My laptop decided to use the precise moment at which I sent a message to all 120 of my Swallowers and Followers to fail and I was on the verge of tears. My lovely housemate took me out to get a fry up (the vegetarianism is going well by the way, four months in and just three slip ups, all drunken) before I trekked up to North London to see my esteemed associate Tessa. We needed to send notification out to everyone, and I needed to choose an outfit. In retrospect, Tessa was right, the shorts were a bad idea.
Every so often, the 10:23 HQ would send some of their hate mail to us in case we wanted to respond. I’ve received a distinct lack of hate mail so it’s always nice when someone gets angry enough to get involved. At about 11pm on Friday night, I received one such message. I got a surprisingly polite reply back and we had a conversation til about 1am. It turns out that although Anna and I might not be singing from the same hymn sheet, we are at least in the same key. She, like most people, cares just as much about public health as I do, and I can honestly say it was refreshing to converse with someone who, despite not agreeing with most of the time, came across as an intelligent and articulate person. After our first ranty response (mine was just as bad as hers!) we had a rather civil discussion. I recommended a couple of books, and invited her to come to Skeptics in the Pub sometime. To any homeopathy supporters reading this, please do come to Skeptics in the Pub. There have been some really snotty messages on Twitter about the sorts of people who attend. At least give us the benefit of face to face conversations before you make public your assumptions about us. We’re a lovely bunch really!
After about four hours sleep, I managed to somehow wake up before the first of three alarms (!), made a cup of tea, got dressed, ticked off everything in my to-do list (which I’d already done before bed), put some make up on, checked my emails and Twitter feed, and left my house. My bedroom looks onto a small park and a block of flats opposite, I generally don’t open my curtains, so I was FLABBERGASTED when I opened my front door to find out it was SNOWING. To say I was unimpressed would be a gross understatement. I was livid. Jamie, one of my lovely volunteers met me at the station and took the brunt of my foul morning temper. He deserved cake slightly more than most!
We eventually got to Red Lion Square in Holborn to find Martin (the editor of www.layscience.net and Science PR legend) there with a TV crew, looking all cold. Skeptic friends Alan, Maria, Sarah, Mark, Francis, Snowy (haha) and Simon were there to distribute t-shirts, sign people in, mingle around looking fabulous in their 10:23 t-shirts. Paolo was on hand to provide crowd control in the form of his big booming voice, and I pretty much hugged everyone I could for missioning it into London in the freezing cold!
At time of writing, no one has experienced any side effects from their overdose. I had a brief scare when someone on Twitter had a cold, but she said it was unrelated. I’ve been a bit tired since Saturday morning, but I think that has more to do with a lack of sleep due to the incredible emails I’ve been receiving at all times of the day, rather than downing a bottle of Belladonna 30C. Pretty much everyones videos and photos had been uploaded by Sunday evening when I eventually sat down with my laptop (now working), and I got really emotional. Everyone who took part was smiling and laughing, it just made all that hard work better than worthwhile.
I am so proud of everyone in the world who took part and showed their support, and I am genuinely honoured to be associated with all of you. In particular, I’d like to thank Tessa, Martin, Simon, David, Imran, Andy W, Marsh, and a mate who provided the money for extra t-shirts at the last minute, as well as Evan Harris MP, Dave Gorman, Chris French, Andy Lewis, and my excellent 10:23 London Team – Simon, Alan, Maria, Jamie, Francis, Sarah, Sandra and Paolo as well as Michael Willoughby and James O’Malley for their excellent films, and the stunning Kelly Haddow for her expert photography skills.
Can’t wait to do another one!
10:23 – Why I Care
A few months ago, I was chatting to a friend of mine in a pub about a horrific story in the papers at the time about a very young girl who died of septicaemia from untreated eczema. I say “untreated”… her father was a homeopath.
It was around the same time we in the UK were hearing more horror stories, like “Baby P” and Madeleine McCann, so it tied in with a general child abuse theme that seemed to keep cropping up.
My friend and I were talking about how something needed to be done. Something that would get public attention, so that people would be given a balanced view of certain types of healthcare. After all, Simon and I knew that homeopathy doesn’t work beyond the placebo effect, everyone else should have the right to know too. Once the public are aware of different sides of the argument, it would enable them to choose whether they wanted magic water or a medicine that has been scientifically proven to work. In Gloria’s case, a bit of E45 or possibly hydrocortisone would have done the trick – I should know, I get eczema too.
A few weeks later, I was contacted by a lovely bloke called Andy, Simon had passed my details on to him. Andy oop North needed a Londoner to help out with organising a nationwide event to make the public aware of the quack that we call “homeopathy”. Naturally, I jumped at the chance. This is exactly what I had in mind.
Then in December, a major spokesperson for Boots (one of the leading pharmacists in the UK, a bit of an institution really!) announced that it didn’t matter to Boots that they know homeopathy doesn’t work, they were going to keep peddling it anyway! Hang on, yes, that’s right: homeopathic pills turn over a profit, therefore they’re going to keep selling it. And homeopaths accuse *me* of being big pharma shill!
The 10:23 campaign means such a lot to me, not because I’m big pharma (I’m not, incidentally. I’m an admin clerk for a fine arts company!) but because it’s something we should all care about.
Admittedly, I’ve taken Bach’s Remedy and Relief for exam stress and it worked. It worked even better if I took double the recommended dose. But as soon as I googled the ingredients and discovered it was all in my mind (and I’d failed one of my A-Levels) its effect completely stopped. Perhaps by taking away the belief in a dummy-medicine (placebo) I’m doing the world a disservice. Or perhaps you, me, Gloria, and the millions of HIV positive and AIDs sufferers in Africa deserve the right to an informed, evidence based decision about what goes into our bodies.
For more information about 10:23, and to take part, please visit our website.
Sins of Eve

I’m back! Thank you for all your suggestions for blog posts. Truth be told, most of them were crap. You can do much better, I’m sure of it. Send all queries to @UnfriendlyA on Twitter from now on, as my previous PA is a bit shagged out
In Genesis 2:17 (King James version), God makes it very clear that if anyone were to eat the fruit of the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, they will surely die. Not probably, but surely:
2:17
But of the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, thou shalt not eat of it: for in the day that thou eatest thereof thou shalt surely die.
What purpose would it serve to threaten an uneducated, otherwise innocent person with death for the consumption of one particular type of fruit, whilst the rest remained fit for human consumption? Were the apples poisonous? In which case, why put them there? Why put the tree there in plain view of two people who would have otherwise been quite happy with mangoes, pineapples, raspberries, kiwi fruits, bananas, lychees, pears, oranges, plum tomatoes etc had the devil not happened to be passing?
Why call it “The Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil” in the first place? Surely “God’s Apples: Hands Off” would have been sufficient? And if this fruit was out of bounds, why put the tree in the centre of the place you have built for these little naked humans? If I’ve learnt one thing from moving out of home into shared accomodation, it’s that anything you leave in shared areas is fair game for the rest of the house mates, with the possible exception of my toothbrush (I hope).
I can’t help but wonder that if the woman hadn’t been denied access to this sensitive, classified information – Knowledge of Good and Evil – would she have bothered eating it? If she had been taught the difference between right and wrong, and was granted some kind of context in order to be able to choose freely, would she have chosen:
3:16
Unto the woman he said, I will greatly multiply thy sorrow and thy conception; in sorrow thou shalt bring forth children; and thy desire shall be to thy husband, and he shall rule over thee.
Subservience to a husband?
3:17
And unto Adam he said, Because thou hast hearkened unto the voice of thy wife, and hast eaten of the tree, of which I commanded thee, saying, Thou shalt not eat of it: cursed is the ground for thy sake; in sorrow shalt thou eat of it all the days of thy life;
An ongoing sense of guilt?
3:18
Thorns also and thistles shall it bring forth to thee; and thou shalt eat the herb of the field;
Stinging nettles?
3:19
In the sweat of thy face shalt thou eat bread, till thou return unto the ground; for out of it wast thou taken: for dust thou art, and unto dust shalt thou return.
Decomposition of your lifeless corpse?
What kind of great, amazing god wouldn’t have seen this coming? I’ve heard so often how God has a plan, which we are too puny to understand. This plan’s been in the making for some time now according to the Bible, at least since the Babylonians have been styling their hair and performing complicated mathematical tasks for fun. Why didn’t he bother to draw up a plan of the world before making it and think “Oh me, I’d better move that bloody Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil before I end making more work for myself by systematically killing African babies for no good reason in 6000 years time from the fatal misinformation that my appointed representative on earth is spewing out at an unfathomable rate”?
I’ll tell you why: Whoever wrote this book, had no clue about narrative. The plot holes in this story are bigger than Jordans vayjayjay. My creative writing class teacher would laugh me out of the building for something like this. It’s the sort of story that the Farrely brothers would write, except they’d make it into a comedy in which God is the bumbling idiot. That so many have been raped, tortured, beaten, stoned, and murdered in its name is the real original sin.
In my interpretation of the events of this story, it doesn’t matter that the woman didn’t know any better, because she went and found out. Remember, God told her that she’d die if she ate the forbidden fruit. Yeah, in the long run, maybe, but not immediately. God was sort of ambiguous there. That’s one of the funny things about God, he never really says anything of use, sort of like a Tory politician. The devil, therefore, was right. They ate from the Tree of Knowledge of Good and Evil, and took their first steps into skepticism.
Hiya, sorry I haven’t been blogging muc…
Memo to self: blog more ffs!
Unfriendly Atheist at it again
“Was the elephant man descended from monkeys?”
-Literally in Leicester

“Tis true my form is something odd,
But blaming me is blaming God.
Could I create myself anew,
I would not fail in pleasing you.
If I could reach from pole to pole,
Or grasp the ocean with a span,
I would be measured by the soul,
The mind’s the standard of the man.”
For those who don’t know, The Elephant Man, also known as Joseph Merrick (often wrongly called “John Merrick”) was a Victorian sideshow performer, infamous for his looks, but sadly not his charm.
There is still some speculation as to what he was afflicted with. Initially, it was thought to be Neurofibromatosis type 1, later studies suggested Proteus syndrome, although more recent DNA testing throws this theory into doubt. Other theories have suggested he may have been the love-child of Bono and Barbra Streisand, or that his existence itself can be attributed to something Big Al made up, and nobody ever dared to question him.
Whatever his uncommon affliction, it would not be uncommon in modern times to refer to him as having “a great personality”. By all accounts, this would appear to be the case. According to the oraculous Wikipedia, he enjoyed poetry and flower collecting, both rather fine hobbies, I think you’ll agree.
As far as current technology allows, Joseph Merrick Jr’s ancestors were all of the homosapien variety as far back as 1792. In answer to your question, “Literally in Leicester”, no.
It would appear that The Elephant Man is not descended from cercopithecoids (Old World monkey) or platyrrhines (New World monkey) but, like most humans, he is descended from apes.
What Women Want: The Pill
Tired of trying to figure out what women want? Fear no more for I’ve invented a pill. Here’s how I did it…
First, I took the essence of a natural selection of things women hate (P):
Skid marks
Football-related depression
Overuse of the word “cunt”
A lack of shoes in the correct size
Skinny 19 year old goth girls
Petrol-station flowers
Light rain
Next I purchased enough natural Volvic mineral water (M) to fill my local swimming pool thirty times. I chose Purley Swimming Pool and Recreation Centre, because children piss in it, and women hate that too. Then I filled the swimming pool up with one part P to 99 parts M. Then I continued to dilute this formula until I ended up with literally none of P left in the solution (PMS). Now, logic-deniers among you might think that because PMS contains none of the original ingredients, it would be ineffective. But you would be WRONG because I remember doing it, and water has a memory. It’s literally like quantum physics, only without all that unnecessary bumf. Like quantum theory. And physics.
Finally, using an eco-friendly, naturally quantifiable pipette, I put a drop of PMS onto some Jelly Belly Jelly Beans (Tutti Frutti) and voila!
Each bag of 100 PMS pills will set you back £299.99 plus VAT (get in there before Jan 1st to take advantage of UK current VAT rate of just 15%!)
The pills can be taken orally, but for maximum effect, just stare at them, and you will naturally absorb this potent synthesised PMS, naturally.
*In case of overdose, please consult your doctor. Not suitable for diabetics. Always read the label. But you should be fine because it’s a natural remedy.
10:23
